Or at least that’s what one respected PhD in Climate Science says. This is not an article that will be comfortable for those who think Science is Truth.

Instead, this is the result of biased funding sources, too many PhDs, and the publicity machine.

As I bring up the amazing success rate of climate science.

Actually, I don't know a single prediction they've made that panned out.

Typical example: this.

As you can see, the original sounds appropriately "scence-y" -- it just doesn't happen to be true. Which reminds me of a favorite from years ago:

Click to view

Which, on the showing of the Guardian ( Read more... )

In a surprise move, a Canadian court decides that accusers have to produce evidence for their case. This disqualifies Michael Mann, noted "climate scientist" from winning a case against those who accuse him of fraud for his "hockey stick" graph. As it turns out, the case was in front of someone who did more than ask Mr. Mann to show his diplomas ( Read more... )

Popular Technology.net: 1350+ Peer-Reviewed Papers Supporting Skeptic Arguments Against ACC/AGW AlarmWhat's interesting about the list is that while it, and individual papers, have been subject to some criticism, the list includes both the criticism and the rebuttal arguments, classified by sub-subject ( Read more... )

We now have enough data to disprove the human causation part of global warming. Not that anyone is paying attention. They'd rather take the opportunity to set up new government controls and taxes, because someone's brother in law needs a government job.

Sigh.

The beginning of the end: warmists in retreat on sea level rise, climate sensitivity | Watts Up With That?
Now climate scientists and the catastrophe-obsessed media are now forced, for perhaps the very first time, to talk about CO2 quadrupling in order to get the much wanted catastrophe scenarios
So where does that leave us? A quadrupling from 280 ( Read more... )

Ok, we now have the study we need using real world data and official model data:

The trend speaks for itself. Predicted warming has not occurred and the actual temperatures are all more than one standard deviation below even the fixed 2000 CO2 levels (orange curve). All 6 annual temperatures lie below all scenario curves. The quoted error on a ( Read more... )

We have had quick and dirty proofs that climate change was not occurring. We have had point by point refutations of climate change citing peer-reviewed studies. We have had revelations of the wonky, poorly designed software that the climate scientists were using. The Met Office has said that temperatures have not increased during the past 15 ( Read more... )

Unless you're an advocate of the Anthropogenic Global Warming theory.

Then you might want to check this out. Not that I expect much checking. Most people are happy to go along with the headlines, without considering whether or not they were justified, and the UN Committee system was geared to that fact.

Otherwise, you might look for data.

As it turns out, there is now a point-by-point refutation (PDF) of the major hysterical claims of the global warming crowd, citing peer-reviewed research showing that the claims are wildly overblown ( Read more... )